FeaturesTimelineNewLearnNews BytesPricingAboutThayabox LogoThayaboxTrade on Web / DesktopGet Mobile App
Table of Contents

Chapter 1: Regulatory Framework for Securities Market

The securities market plays a foundational role in the economic growth of a nation by mobilizing household and institutional savings and channeling them into productive capital investments. To foster confidence among investors and ensure the integrity, safety, and fairness of capital market transactions, a robust, transparent, and enforceable regulatory architecture is essential.

Before the modern regulatory era, the Indian securities market was governed by fragmented pieces of legislation, primarily under the Capital Issues (Control) Act of 1947, which empowered the Controller of Capital Issues (CCI) to artificially determine the pricing and timing of corporate equity issuances. Economic liberalization in 1991 led to the abolishment of the CCI and the formal statutory establishment of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in 1992.

The statutory framework governing the Indian capital markets is designed to fulfill three primary, interdependent statutory mandates:

  1. Protecting the interests of investors in securities: Ensuring full, fair, and timely disclosure of material facts, establishing robust investor grievance mechanisms, and protecting participants against fraud, misleading information, and market manipulation.
  2. Promoting the development of the securities market: Encouraging the adoption of cutting-edge trading, clearing, and settlement technologies, expanding retail participation through accessible mechanisms, and fostering the development of innovative financial instruments.
  3. Regulating the securities market: Creating enforceable codes of conduct, licensing and supervising intermediaries, and maintaining fair, transparent, and orderly trading across exchanges and depositories.

The regulatory landscape of the Indian securities market rests upon four major legislative pillars, supplemented by key central enactments:

1. The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act)

The SEBI Act establishes the statutory authority of SEBI as an autonomous regulatory body with comprehensive administrative, legislative, and quasi-judicial powers.

  • Section 11: Outlines the broad functions of the Board, including registering and regulating intermediaries, promoting investor education, prohibiting fraudulent and unfair trade practices (FUTP), regulating substantial acquisitions and takeovers, and conducting inspections, audits, and inquiries.
  • Section 11B: Empowers SEBI to issue binding directions to any intermediary, company, or individual in the interests of investors or orderly market operations, including impounding unlawful gains, freezing assets, and barring wrongdoers from accessing the securities market.
  • Adjudication and Penalties: Grants SEBI statutory power to levy civil monetary penalties for violations such as insider trading, non-disclosure, market manipulation, and failure to resolve investor grievances.

2. The Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (SCRA)

The SCRA provides the legal framework governing securities contracts, the recognition and operation of stock exchanges, and the listing of corporate securities.

  • Defines what constitutes a 'security' under Indian law (Section 2(h)).
  • Governs the grant and withdrawal of recognition to stock exchanges and clearing corporations.
  • Regulates the listing of securities on recognized exchanges and empowers the Central Government and SEBI to compel listing or delisting.
  • Prohibits contracts in securities other than spot delivery contracts or contracts settled through recognized stock exchange clearing houses.

3. The Depositories Act, 1996

The Depositories Act revolutionized Indian securities settlement by introducing the legal architecture for the dematerialization and electronic transfer of ownership of securities.

  • Enables the free, electronic transferability of securities without physical share certificates and stamp duty on transfers.
  • Establishes the legal dichotomy between the Registered Owner (the depository, which holds the legal title in the issuer's register of members) and the Beneficial Owner (the investor, who enjoys all economic and voting rights).
  • Mandates the maintenance of fungible electronic holdings, eliminating risks associated with bad delivery, stolen certificates, forgery, and physical transit delays.

4. The Companies Act, 2013

The Companies Act governs corporate governance, incorporation, capital structuring, public offerings, and investor communications for companies in India.

  • Regulates the issuance of prospectus, allotment of securities, private placements, and corporate actions such as rights issues, bonus issues, and buybacks.
  • Mandates compliance with corporate governance standards, independent director oversight, audit committees, and financial disclosures.

India's financial system operates under an apex sectoral regulatory model where specialized statutory bodies regulate distinct segments of the financial sector:

  • Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI): Regulates capital markets, stock exchanges, clearing corporations, depositories, mutual funds, portfolio managers, alternative investment funds, and capital market intermediaries.
  • Reserve Bank of India (RBI): Regulates banking, credit institutions, money markets, government securities (G-Secs) market, foreign exchange (Forex) markets, and payment/settlement systems.
  • Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI): Regulates the life and general insurance industry, protecting policyholders and overseeing insurance investment portfolios.
  • Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA): Regulates the National Pension System (NPS) and other pension schemes.
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI): Regulates corporate insolvency, liquidation processes, and resolution professionals.

Financial Stability and Development Council (FSDC)

To coordinate among these regulatory agencies, resolve jurisdictional overlaps, and monitor systemic financial stability, the Government of India established the Financial Stability and Development Council (FSDC) in 2010.

  • Composition: Chaired by the Union Finance Minister, with members including the Governor of RBI, Chairperson of SEBI, Chairperson of IRDAI, Chairperson of PFRDA, Finance Secretary, Chief Economic Adviser, and other senior officials.
  • FSDC Sub-Committee: Chaired by the Governor of RBI, focusing on financial stability assessments, macro-prudential surveillance, inter-regulatory coordination, and promoting financial literacy and inclusion across India.

To ensure natural justice, procedural fairness, and due process, orders passed by SEBI or its Adjudicating Officers are subject to independent judicial review.

Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT)

The Securities Appellate Tribunal is a statutory, judicial body established under Section 15K of the SEBI Act, 1992.

  • Jurisdiction: SAT hears and disposes of appeals against orders passed by:
    1. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) or its Adjudicating Officers.
    2. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI).
    3. The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA).
    4. Recognized Stock Exchanges, Depositories, and Clearing Corporations acting under delegated statutory powers.
  • Composition: SAT consists of a Presiding Officer (a retired Judge of the Supreme Court or a retired Chief Justice of a High Court) and Judicial and Technical Members possessing specialized expertise in law, finance, and securities markets.
  • Appellate Timeline: Any person aggrieved by an order of SEBI may file an appeal before SAT within 45 days from the date on which a copy of the order is received.

Appeal to the Supreme Court of India

Under Section 15Z of the SEBI Act, any person aggrieved by any decision or order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal may file an appeal to the Supreme Court of India within 60 days from the date of communication of the SAT decision. Such appeals are admissible on any substantial question of law arising out of the order.