FeaturesTimelineNewLearnNews BytesPricingAboutThayabox LogoThayaboxTrade on Web / DesktopGet Mobile App
Table of Contents

Chapter 11: Valuation

Valuation of private market investments is fundamentally different from traditional asset valuation. While publicly listed equities trade continuously on liquid exchanges providing instantaneous market price discovery, private equity and private debt assets are unquoted and illiquid. Establishing the Fair Value of unlisted portfolio investments requires robust, objective, and internationally recognized accounting and valuation methodologies.

The Fair Value Principle (Ind AS 113 / IFRS 13)

Under Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 113 and the International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation (IPEV) Guidelines, Fair Value is defined as:

"The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions."

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                     THE FAIR VALUE INPUT HIERARCHY                                 |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| LEVEL HIERARCHY          | INPUT CHARACTERISTICS & NATURE      | RELEVANCE TO AIF ASSETS           |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **Level 1 Inputs**       | Quoted prices (unadjusted) in       | Listed equity shares held by      |
| (Highest Reliability)    | active markets for identical assets.| Category III or pre-IPO AIFs.     |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **Level 2 Inputs**       | Inputs other than quoted prices that| Quoted prices in inactive markets;|
| (Moderate Reliability)   | are observable directly/indirectly. | corporate bonds, interest rates.  |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+
| **Level 3 Inputs**       | Unobservable inputs reflecting the  | **Core of Category I & II AIFs;**  |
| (Lowest Reliability)     | fund's internal cash-flow models.   | unlisted startups, growth equity. |
+--------------------------+-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------+

Governing Valuation Standards

  1. IPEV Guidelines: The International Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation Guidelines represent the global gold standard for valuing private equity investments, endorsed by international institutional LPs.
  2. SEBI Valuation Directives: SEBI mandates that every AIF must formulate a comprehensive, written Valuation Policy approved by the Trustee. Category I and II AIFs must carry out valuation of their investments at least once every six months by an independent Registered Valuer or SEBI-registered Merchant Banker.

In evaluating unlisted operating enterprises, independent valuers deploy three primary valuation approaches recognized under global valuation standards: the Income Approach, the Market Approach, and the Asset-Based Approach.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                    THE THREE CORE VALUATION APPROACHES                             |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|                                                                                                    |
|    +------------------------+------------------------+----------------------+                     |
|    |    INCOME APPROACH     |    MARKET APPROACH     | ASSET-BASED APPROACH |                     |
|    +------------------------+------------------------+----------------------+                     |
|    | • Discounted Cash Flow | • Comparable Company   | • Net Asset Value    |                     |
|    |   (DCF / FCFF)         |   Multiples (EV/EBITDA)|   (Book Value)       |                     |
|    | • Free Cash Flow to    | • Precedent Transaction| • Adjusted Net Asset |                     |
|    |   Equity (FCFE)        |   Multiples            |   Method (NAV)       |                     |
|    | • Terminal Value & WACC| • Price of Recent Round| • Liquidation Value  |                     |
|    +------------------------+------------------------+----------------------+                     |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

1. The Income Approach: Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Valuation

The DCF methodology estimates the intrinsic enterprise value of an operating company by discounting its projected future Free Cash Flows to the Firm (FCFF) back to the present value using the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC):

$$\text{Enterprise Value (EV)} = \sum_{t=1}^{n} \frac{\text{FCFF}_t}{(1 + \text{WACC})^t} + \frac{\text{Terminal Value}_n}{(1 + \text{WACC})^n}$$

Where:

  • Free Cash Flow to Firm (FCFF): $$\text{FCFF} = \text{EBIT} \cdot (1 - t) + \text{Depreciation} - \text{Capital Expenditures} - \Delta\text{Working Capital}$$
  • Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC): $$\text{WACC} = \left(\frac{E}{V} \cdot K_e\right) + \left(\frac{D}{V} \cdot K_d \cdot (1 - t)\right)$$
  • Terminal Value (TV): Calculated via the Gordon Growth Model: $$\text{Terminal Value} = \frac{\text{FCFF}_{n+1}}{\text{WACC} - g}$$ (Where $g$ represents the sustainable perpetual long-term growth rate).

2. The Market Approach: Relative Valuation

Estimates enterprise value by benchmarking the target company against peer companies:

  • Comparable Company Analysis (Trading Multiples): Applying median enterprise multiples (such as Enterprise Value to EBITDA [EV/EBITDA], Price to Earnings [P/E], or EV to Sales) of publicly listed peers to the investee company's financial metrics, adjusted for a Discounts for Lack of Marketability (DLOM) (typically 20% to 30%).
  • Precedent Transaction Multiples: Analyzing valuation multiples paid in recent controlling acquisitions of comparable private enterprises within the same industry sector.
  • Price of Recent Investment (Recent Financing Round): Valuing the company based on the price-per-share established in an arm’s length subsequent financing round by a reputable third-party institutional investor, provided market conditions remain stable.

The culmination of the portfolio valuation process is the computation and publication of the fund's Net Asset Value (NAV). For closed-ended Category I and II AIFs, NAV represents the fair market benchmark for assessing fund health, computing RVPI/TVPI multiples, and determining unit values for secondary transfers.

Mathematical Formulation of AIF Net Asset Value

$$\text{Net Asset Value (NAV)} = \frac{\text{Total Fair Value of Portfolio Assets} + \text{Cash & Receivables} - \text{Total Liabilities}}{\text{Total Number of Outstanding Units}}$$

Where:

  • Portfolio Assets: Sum of fair values of unlisted equity shares, convertible instruments, debentures, and real estate SPVs determined by the independent valuer.
  • Cash & Cash Equivalents: Liquid balances held in escrow bank accounts, overnight debt funds, and treasury bills.
  • Total Liabilities: Accrued management fees payable to the manager, statutory audit fees, custody charges, and tax withholding provisions.

Statutory Obligations of Independent Valuers

SEBI regulations mandate strict independence standards for entities valuing AIF portfolio companies:

  1. Statutory Qualification: The valuer must be an independent Registered Valuer registered with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) under the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, 2017, or an independent SEBI-registered Category I Merchant Banker.
  2. Conflict of Interest Prohibition: The valuer cannot be an associate, auditor, or subsidiary of the Sponsor, Investment Manager, or Trustee.
  3. Reasonableness Assessment: Valuers must document the underlying assumptions, discount rates, beta coefficients, and growth rates used in DCF models, ensuring valuations are verifiable by statutory auditors and regulatory inspectors.